MAC MINI VS MAC MINI SERVER UPGRADE
MAC MINI VS MAC MINI SERVER PRO
MAC MINI VS MAC MINI SERVER SOFTWARE
MAC MINI VS MAC MINI SERVER TV

The results aren't very surprising, with the Radeon HD 6630 equipped mini beating the HD 3000 equipped mini handily in all graphics intensive task. So, Macworld posted benchmarks for the dual-core 2.3 GHz Core i5 with Intel HD 3000 graphics and the dual-core 2.5 GHz Core i5 with discrete AMD graphics.

I wish I'd had this forum to ask similar questions last autumn, to be honest. You can buy a slower hard drive now and swap it out later the newer minis are far more user-configurable than the G4 one I have sitting atop my television. I don't honestly need that kind of speed, even working freelance at home. I'd stay away from SSDs until the real nerds drive the prices down a bit more. That suggests I should recommend the server over the standard mini.

MAC MINI VS MAC MINI SERVER PRO

I usually try to buy the most future-proof machine I can afford that has storage expansion options, which is why I got a 6-core Mac Pro last winter instead of an iMac. I usually try to compromise between the premium paid for a faster processor and the economy of my current situation. The specifics of the apps you'll be running are outside of my area of familiarity. Were I merely considering running apps that require faster processors, I'd go as high in the product line as possible and possibly add RAM later. Were I merely considering usage that requires multiple apps to run simultaneously, I'd buy the middle-of-the-road machine and boost the RAM as high as I could. The fact that you've narrowed this purchase down to one product line helps.

I'm thankful for any help the wise men and women of the Achaia can offer me.

MAC MINI VS MAC MINI SERVER SOFTWARE

Do I have to care about whether the internal HDD has 5400 rpm or 7200 rpm in this kind of machine?Р”Р„ few last words: The MacBook Pro will get Lion as well as essential software and will be pulled-out of a drawer should I need a full-fledged Mac when I'm travelling.

Do four cores compensate the processing power of a dedicated graphics card when editing photos and videos or transcoding video?.

Which one is going to finish the heavy lifting task faster, given my usecase?.

Do I get the 2.5 GHz dual-core machine with a dedicated graphics card and the slower HDD, or do I get a 2.0GHz quad-core machine with an integrated graphics chip, shared memory and a faster HDD?.

I'm leaning to the Mac mini Server, but I'm faced with a few questions: USB2.0 HDD with a 1.5 TB partition as a SuperDuper! clone of the media drive and a 500 GB partition as a secondary SuperDuper! clone of the primary int.

Quad-Core 2.0 GHz Core i7 with the integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000.

USB2.0 HDD as a SuperDuper! clone for the 2 TB ext. FW800 HDD for other media (1.5 TB partition) and Time Machine backups (500 GB partition)

500 GB internal for regular use, photos and music.

MAC MINI VS MAC MINI SERVER UPGRADE

Stock 4 GB RAM (will upgrade it to 8GB myself).

Dual-Core 2.5 GHz Core i5 (or 2.7 Ghz Core i7, if the ~ РІвЂљВ¬100,- are worth it) with the AMD Radeon HD 6630M.

I mostly play games on the iPad and iPhone, I don't believe I will be playing any taxing games on the Mac mini. The movies are usually below one hour long and the material ranges from SD, to 720p/1080p.

Video editing: I sometimes edit videos my father or I shot with iMovie.

Media serving: The machine will host my iTunes Music, which I want available through Home Sharing on my iPad and iPhone 4.

Video conversion: Rather often I transcode videos from one format to another, the tools I use for this are Handbrake, MP4tools and Quicktime (all of those tools are 64bit, if I'm not much mistaken and make use of multiple cores).

Photo editing: I use Aperture, iPhoto and lately Flare to manage, store and edit my photos.

MAC MINI VS MAC MINI SERVER TV

Media playback: This is going to be my main machine for listening to music, watching movies and TV series.

General purpose computing: iWork, web browsing, light web programming, PIM and so on.

I would love to get some input on what to buy from the Achaia, so here are the things I'm going to use it for (in order of importance): With the previous generation, this was an easy decision, since the MM Server was the best-spec'd machine, now things are different. Now that it finally arrived I'm faced with a dilemma: Am I going to buy a Mac mini Server or a regular Mac mini? After purchasing an iPad 2, I knew that what I needed was a stationary machine and after much consideration I decided to get a Mac mini, since I already have a nice 24' Dell monitor (U2410 for those who want to know).Р”Р„ware of the fact that the mini was going to be refreshed soon, with Sandy Bridge architecture and the Thunderbolt interface, I waited.

After 3.5 years my MacBook Pro is ready to be replaced.

Mac mini vs mac mini server